Natural-Farmed Maize Out-Yielded Chemical, 4.8 vs 4.1 t/ha
Richard Kwame Denteh, Konkuk University, Department of Bioresource and Food Science (student; supervisor Prof. Doo Hwan Kim) · Ghana
A one-season maize trial at Konkuk's Paju research centre compared natural farming, organic and conventional (chemical) systems side by side. The natural plots had the longest, heaviest ears and the highest yield: 4.8 t/ha dry grain against 4.3 for organic and 4.1 for conventional. After a one-week drought just after germination, 20 of 84 conventional seedlings wilted, against 4 natural and 3 organic.
What they found
How does maize perform under natural farming compared with organic and conventional (chemical) farming?
KU Nature Science Research Centre, Paju, Korea, May to August 2016. Maize, Korean waxy-corn cultivar chal-ogsusu (Ivory II). Completely randomized design, 3 treatments, total area 126 m², 84 seedlings per treatment (from the drought slide). Number of replicates, plot size, soil type, irrigation and the statistical test are not stated; tables carry significance letters. The speaker said the work is meant to be repeated in Ghana.
- T1 Natural farming — 'Natural resource input only.' Table 1, first column (header washed out, likely seed treatment): Mineral A 1:500, Cleanser (BRV) 1:500, mugwort Food (FPJ) 1:1000, Medicine (OHN) 1:1000, Fuel (FAA) 1:1000, Structure (CaP) 1:500, maltose 1:1000. Type II (vegetative) treatment: OHN 1:1000, FPJ 1:500, Protectors (LAB) 1:1000, calcium phosphate 1:1000, brown rice vinegar 1:500. Transition treatment: FPJ 1:500, Reproduction (WSC, water-soluble calcium) 1:1000, OHN 1:500, then LAB, CaP and BRV at rates hidden by the speaker. Spoken: soil treatment with IMO or mineral and mulch; Type II and transition sprays were foliar. Frequency not stated.
- T2 Organic system — Decomposed organic materials. Kind and rate not stated.
- T3 Conventional system — Fertilizers and other chemical inputs, including pesticides. Products and rates not stated.
-
Dry grain yield 4.8 t/ha natural vs 4.3 organic and 4.1 conventional
Table 5: natural 4.8 (a), organic 4.3 (b), conventional 4.1 (b) t/ha dry grain; about 17% above conventional. Grain weight at harvest (wet): 7.1 (a), 6.4 (b), 6.0 (b) t/ha. Organic and conventional are not different by the letters.
▶ 11:19 Said and shown on the slides
-
Conventional lost 20 of 84 seedlings to a one-week drought; natural 4, organic 3
Figure 1, plants wilted out of 84 seedlings per treatment, drought just after germination. Organic did slightly better than natural here.
▶ 7:39 Said and shown on the slides
-
Longest and heaviest ears in natural: 23.1 cm and 449.4 g
Table 3: ear length 23.10 (a), 20.85 (a), 17.85 (b) cm; ear weight 449.4 (a), 394.1 (b), 339.3 (c) g, for natural, organic, conventional.
▶ 10:21 From the slides
-
About 998 grains per plant in natural vs 928 organic and 913 conventional
Tables 3 and 4: 997.7 (a), 928.4 (b), 912.8 (b).
▶ 10:40 From the slides
-
Dry grain weight 236.8 g per plant in natural vs 205.2 g conventional
Table 4: grain weight at harvest 350.4 (a), 318.6 (b), 300.2 (b) g/plant; dry grain 236.8 (a), 214.8 (b), 205.2 (b) g/plant, for natural, organic, conventional.
▶ 10:59 From the slides
-
Few tillers (suckers) in natural, many in organic and conventional
Slide: 'Tillering case very serious with organic and conventional but very few cases in natural.' Photos only; no counts.
▶ 7:59 Said and shown on the slides
-
Insect damage on organic and conventional leaves; natural looked clean
Figure 2, photos dated 2016/07/07. No counts or damage scores given.
▶ 8:35 Said and shown on the slides
-
Natural plant had the largest root mass with many root hairs
Figure 4: one dug-up root system per treatment, photographed side by side. No measurements.
▶ 9:50 Said and shown on the slides
- One season, one site (Paju, Korea), 126 m² in total; number of replicates and plot size not stated.
- Statistical test not named; significance shown only as letters.
- Rates for the organic and conventional systems were not given, so 'conventional' and 'organic' cannot be judged as good or poor practice.
- Tillering, insect and root results are photos only, with no counts; the root comparison is one plant per treatment.
- Photos of the drought plots appear to show black plastic mulch on organic and conventional rows and straw on natural, so mulch may differ between systems as well as inputs.
- Some transition-stage rates were hidden by the speaker; spray frequency was not stated.
- The Ghana background figures are context, not trial results; the planned Ghana replication was not reported.
- In this one season, maize under a full natural farming program (seed treatment, a Type II vegetative spray, a transition spray) gave about 17% more dry grain per hectare than chemical farming, and bigger ears.
- Natural-farmed seedlings came through a one-week drought far better than chemically fed ones (4 vs 20 of 84 wilted).
- The program changed sprays by growth stage: Food, Medicine, Protectors and Structure in vegetative growth, then Reproduction (water-soluble calcium) added at the transition.
- Corn that throws many suckers may be getting more than it needs; the natural plots tillered least.
Next to Master Cho's teaching
-
Agrees
Different sprays for vegetative growth and the transition Cho's nutritive cycle defines a changeover period between vegetative and reproductive growth that needs little N and more P, with calcium phosphate given ahead of flower differentiation. The trial switched to a transition mix with water-soluble calcium and CaP.
Cho nutrient cycle prescription table (Oct 2017, transcribed) — 2. Changeover Period (교대기)
-
Agrees
OHN, FPJ and BRV as the base spray and for seed treatment Cho uses OHN through all stages at 500–1,000x, mixes it with FPJ and BRV for weak plants, and lists it for seed treatment; the trial's seed and Type II mixes use these at 1:500–1:1000.
Cho, Janong Natural Farming (2003), p. 122–123
-
Agrees
Natural-farmed crops held up better in drought Cho writes that indigenous microbes around the roots let crops grow strong through droughts and temperature extremes. The trial's seedling counts fit, though here organic did as well as natural.
Cho, Cho Han-Kyu's Natural Farming (Theory), p. 27
-
Agrees
Fewer pests and suckers without chemical nitrogen Cho's seminar teaching treats aphids and mites as a sign of over-fertilized nitrogen; Pure KNF teaching links heavy nitrogen to suckers. The trial showed fewer tillers and less insect damage in natural plots, by photo only.
Cho - DVD rips/NAT_FARM_DISK_31 @ 0:40:00 (translated)
“See conventional, 20 plants dying just because of short one-week period of drought.”
▶ 7:46
“Natural was able to stand because of the natural, you know, protective that was given to the crop, from the inputs.”
▶ 9:06
“Natural farming is not only solving the problem of environmental health and food safety issues, but also can contribute or can replace other systems.”
▶ 11:37
In this talk
- 0:00Intro
- 1:00Farming in Ghana
- 1:53Ghana's main crops
- 2:43Why natural farming
- 3:34Thanks to Hawaiʻi
- 3:58Variety, site and design
- 5:38Treatments by growth stage
- 7:16Drought after germination
- 7:52Tillering
- 8:35Insects
- 9:31Root development
- 10:14Ears and grains per plant
- 10:40Grain weight per plant
- 11:19Yield per hectare
- 11:30Conclusion
Transcript
Transcribed and checked by hand against the recording. Click any time to play from there.
0:00 Aloha! Thank you. Okay, loud? So, my name is Richard. Kwame Denteh. I come from Ghana. And my supervisor... I am a student of Konkuk University, and my supervisor is Professor Doo Hwan Kim, and I'm presenting on the topic maize production under natural science, organic and conventional farming systems. I want to just give a brief introduction of Ghana
0:51 and the decision why I wanted to know about corn in natural farming. Now, so Ghana is about 24 million people and agriculture employs about 55% of our population. And so you can see maize production is covering about more than a million hectares of land in Ghana, and you can imagine it's a very big deal when it comes to cereal production in Ghana. Actually this research was carried out at Paju, here in Korea, but we tried to do that and then replicate in
1:46 Ghana based on the climatic conditions there in Ghana. So these are the main crops you can find in Ghana. Look at it, you see that maize is occurring as the second crop after cocoa. Ghana is popular for this cocoa, followed by maize. Now rice has come up these days. Rice is becoming the third after maize. So this gives you a clear understanding why I have decided to research so much into corn and the natural farming, for the purpose of our symposium today, natural farming.
2:43 So yesterday I presented on this topic, so in order not to bore the majority who were here yesterday, I would like to skip some of these, you know, points. But basically, looking around us and everything that you know is coming up it is clear that um conventional farming is a threat to our environment today. When we talk about food safety, we talk about environment, we talk about health, all you will see that conventional farming is having a factor to contribute. This is calling for a serious research to establish
3:30 natural farming that must mature. It started here in Korea. The people of Hawaii are also doing very well. They are all over on YouTube and we are taking a lot of information from them. Mr. Eric, Mr. Trump and so many others, we thank you for the good work you are doing. We are learning a lot from you Hawaii people, and Philippines also. Thank you. So I started my research in May and then in August. Maize, as I have said, the variety I used is chal-ogsusu, Ivory II.
4:19 That is a Korean-developed, you know, variety. So we look at corn and the three farming systems: organic, natural, conventional. Let's see, the natural, we use just natural, you know... let me do this. Okay. We use just natural, you know, resource materials, inputs, no chemical. And the conventional, fertilizer and the pesticides, which are now becoming the problem of the
5:04 day. Well, you know, today you can say we are making a paradigm shift from Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. What it means is that we must look for better ways of agriculture. So natural farming is all about you know maintaining a very good you know regime of nutrient cycle nutrition cycle. So from seed, we did treatment to the seeds for natural farming, and then standards also were maintained for conventional and then organic, you know, likewise. Now after our soil
5:54 treatment, we came in with Type 2. Most of us here are, you know, natural farming enthusiasts, so some of these things we don't have to be explaining them anymore. Now the Type 2 is what you come, you know, or the first input you make after, you know, your soil treatment, which is IMO or mineral, and then your mulch and other things. Now this is foliar application. This one here, that too, foliar application to the crops, and this is supposed to give the whole crops a very good start in growth. Now, so transition here, also these
6:45 are all natural, so, you know, very cheap to make, very cheap, very easy to apply, you know, resources. And this is supposed to help the crop to transform itself from you know that vegetative productive stage to the reproductive you know stage where it starts to, you know, bear fruits and flowers. Now just after germination, not long after germination, there was some drought, and this is what happened to, you know, the crops. Look at this conventional, it's dying. We don't see so much, but look at organic, look at conventional, almost
7:34 everything is established. Now you can see a little bit of information we picked, counting by counting, and see: natural 4, organic 3, you know, see conventional 20 plants dying just because of short one-week period of drought. Okay, so in the course of the growth, we also recorded this. A lot of tillers. In the organic, there were a lot of tillers. Corn, naturally, is not supposed to tiller. It's supposed to be a single stem crop. But see, you have so many plants coming as suckers. See, conventional. It's even more serious with conventional.
8:20 But see the natural. You can see it's without, you know, tillers. And this tells you that we allowed the crop to perform as it stands, as the law of natural farming. Now there was insect occurrence, and look at it from here, see, you see the leaves are all, you know, having those. It's also the same here. I know from there you cannot see very well, but it's not a very serious issue here, but see that natural remains very clean, very clean, and that tells you this. I want to say
9:06 natural was able to stand because of the natural, you know, protective that was given to the crop, you know, from the inputs. They were all grown at the same place. How come insects came and they invaded other crops, and then natural was left untouched? Now let's look at root development. See. So see, natural. Look at the... look at the root size very big and well developed with a lot of root hairs telling you
9:57 that it's going to make a very good uptake from the soil. Now look at, you know, that of organic and conventional. This tells you how, you know, the outcome of growth is going to be. So let's now begin to look at the farmer's main, you know, goal in production, which is yield. So look at it: ear length, ear weight, with, you know, grains per plant. This is for the farmers. And look at the figures. See, conventional, see natural; conventional, natural; conventional, natural. And let's look at number of seeds, number of seeds per plant. See, this is conventional, and look at
10:50 natural; conventional, natural; conventional, natural. You know, this is grain weight at harvesting. You know, corn, when it dries on the farm, it still has some kind of moisture, so you take that weight, and then we took this weight after drying, and still natural is still better than conventional. So this is the, you know, total outcome. Let's see, this is yield, tons per hectare. Okay. As you can see the differences between conventional and natural, organic and natural. This tells you that natural farming is not only solving the
11:37 problem of, you know, environmental health and food safety issues, but also can contribute or can replace you know other systems especially conventional that is giving us all these problems in terms of food production. May I? Thank you.