Skip to main content

Natural-Farmed Maize Out-Yielded Chemical, 4.8 vs 4.1 t/ha

Richard Kwame Denteh, Konkuk University, Department of Bioresource and Food Science (student; supervisor Prof. Doo Hwan Kim) · Ghana

A one-season maize trial at Konkuk's Paju research centre compared natural farming, organic and conventional (chemical) systems side by side. The natural plots had the longest, heaviest ears and the highest yield: 4.8 t/ha dry grain against 4.3 for organic and 4.1 for conventional. After a one-week drought just after germination, 20 of 84 conventional seedlings wilted, against 4 natural and 3 organic.

What they found

The question

How does maize perform under natural farming compared with organic and conventional (chemical) farming?

How they tested it

KU Nature Science Research Centre, Paju, Korea, May to August 2016. Maize, Korean waxy-corn cultivar chal-ogsusu (Ivory II). Completely randomized design, 3 treatments, total area 126 m², 84 seedlings per treatment (from the drought slide). Number of replicates, plot size, soil type, irrigation and the statistical test are not stated; tables carry significance letters. The speaker said the work is meant to be repeated in Ghana.

What was compared
  • T1 Natural farming — 'Natural resource input only.' Table 1, first column (header washed out, likely seed treatment): Mineral A 1:500, Cleanser (BRV) 1:500, mugwort Food (FPJ) 1:1000, Medicine (OHN) 1:1000, Fuel (FAA) 1:1000, Structure (CaP) 1:500, maltose 1:1000. Type II (vegetative) treatment: OHN 1:1000, FPJ 1:500, Protectors (LAB) 1:1000, calcium phosphate 1:1000, brown rice vinegar 1:500. Transition treatment: FPJ 1:500, Reproduction (WSC, water-soluble calcium) 1:1000, OHN 1:500, then LAB, CaP and BRV at rates hidden by the speaker. Spoken: soil treatment with IMO or mineral and mulch; Type II and transition sprays were foliar. Frequency not stated.
  • T2 Organic system — Decomposed organic materials. Kind and rate not stated.
  • T3 Conventional system — Fertilizers and other chemical inputs, including pesticides. Products and rates not stated.
Results
  1. Dry grain yield 4.8 t/ha natural vs 4.3 organic and 4.1 conventional

    Table 5: natural 4.8 (a), organic 4.3 (b), conventional 4.1 (b) t/ha dry grain; about 17% above conventional. Grain weight at harvest (wet): 7.1 (a), 6.4 (b), 6.0 (b) t/ha. Organic and conventional are not different by the letters.

    ▶ 11:19 Said and shown on the slides

  2. Conventional lost 20 of 84 seedlings to a one-week drought; natural 4, organic 3

    Figure 1, plants wilted out of 84 seedlings per treatment, drought just after germination. Organic did slightly better than natural here.

    ▶ 7:39 Said and shown on the slides

  3. Longest and heaviest ears in natural: 23.1 cm and 449.4 g

    Table 3: ear length 23.10 (a), 20.85 (a), 17.85 (b) cm; ear weight 449.4 (a), 394.1 (b), 339.3 (c) g, for natural, organic, conventional.

    ▶ 10:21 From the slides

  4. About 998 grains per plant in natural vs 928 organic and 913 conventional

    Tables 3 and 4: 997.7 (a), 928.4 (b), 912.8 (b).

    ▶ 10:40 From the slides

  5. Dry grain weight 236.8 g per plant in natural vs 205.2 g conventional

    Table 4: grain weight at harvest 350.4 (a), 318.6 (b), 300.2 (b) g/plant; dry grain 236.8 (a), 214.8 (b), 205.2 (b) g/plant, for natural, organic, conventional.

    ▶ 10:59 From the slides

  6. Few tillers (suckers) in natural, many in organic and conventional

    Slide: 'Tillering case very serious with organic and conventional but very few cases in natural.' Photos only; no counts.

    ▶ 7:59 Said and shown on the slides

  7. Insect damage on organic and conventional leaves; natural looked clean

    Figure 2, photos dated 2016/07/07. No counts or damage scores given.

    ▶ 8:35 Said and shown on the slides

  8. Natural plant had the largest root mass with many root hairs

    Figure 4: one dug-up root system per treatment, photographed side by side. No measurements.

    ▶ 9:50 Said and shown on the slides

Hold it loosely
  • One season, one site (Paju, Korea), 126 m² in total; number of replicates and plot size not stated.
  • Statistical test not named; significance shown only as letters.
  • Rates for the organic and conventional systems were not given, so 'conventional' and 'organic' cannot be judged as good or poor practice.
  • Tillering, insect and root results are photos only, with no counts; the root comparison is one plant per treatment.
  • Photos of the drought plots appear to show black plastic mulch on organic and conventional rows and straw on natural, so mulch may differ between systems as well as inputs.
  • Some transition-stage rates were hidden by the speaker; spray frequency was not stated.
  • The Ghana background figures are context, not trial results; the planned Ghana replication was not reported.
For your farm
  • In this one season, maize under a full natural farming program (seed treatment, a Type II vegetative spray, a transition spray) gave about 17% more dry grain per hectare than chemical farming, and bigger ears.
  • Natural-farmed seedlings came through a one-week drought far better than chemically fed ones (4 vs 20 of 84 wilted).
  • The program changed sprays by growth stage: Food, Medicine, Protectors and Structure in vegetative growth, then Reproduction (water-soluble calcium) added at the transition.
  • Corn that throws many suckers may be getting more than it needs; the natural plots tillered least.

Next to Master Cho's teaching

  • Agrees

    Different sprays for vegetative growth and the transition Cho's nutritive cycle defines a changeover period between vegetative and reproductive growth that needs little N and more P, with calcium phosphate given ahead of flower differentiation. The trial switched to a transition mix with water-soluble calcium and CaP.

    Cho nutrient cycle prescription table (Oct 2017, transcribed) — 2. Changeover Period (교대기)

  • Agrees

    OHN, FPJ and BRV as the base spray and for seed treatment Cho uses OHN through all stages at 500–1,000x, mixes it with FPJ and BRV for weak plants, and lists it for seed treatment; the trial's seed and Type II mixes use these at 1:500–1:1000.

    Cho, Janong Natural Farming (2003), p. 122–123

  • Agrees

    Natural-farmed crops held up better in drought Cho writes that indigenous microbes around the roots let crops grow strong through droughts and temperature extremes. The trial's seedling counts fit, though here organic did as well as natural.

    Cho, Cho Han-Kyu's Natural Farming (Theory), p. 27

  • Agrees

    Fewer pests and suckers without chemical nitrogen Cho's seminar teaching treats aphids and mites as a sign of over-fertilized nitrogen; Pure KNF teaching links heavy nitrogen to suckers. The trial showed fewer tillers and less insect damage in natural plots, by photo only.

    Cho - DVD rips/NAT_FARM_DISK_31 @ 0:40:00 (translated)

“See conventional, 20 plants dying just because of short one-week period of drought.”

▶ 7:46

“Natural was able to stand because of the natural, you know, protective that was given to the crop, from the inputs.”

▶ 9:06

“Natural farming is not only solving the problem of environmental health and food safety issues, but also can contribute or can replace other systems.”

▶ 11:37

In this talk

  1. 0:00Intro
  2. 1:00Farming in Ghana
  3. 1:53Ghana's main crops
  4. 2:43Why natural farming
  5. 3:34Thanks to Hawaiʻi
  6. 3:58Variety, site and design
  7. 5:38Treatments by growth stage
  8. 7:16Drought after germination
  9. 7:52Tillering
  10. 8:35Insects
  11. 9:31Root development
  12. 10:14Ears and grains per plant
  13. 10:40Grain weight per plant
  14. 11:19Yield per hectare
  15. 11:30Conclusion

Transcript

Transcribed and checked by hand against the recording. Click any time to play from there.