Rice Root Volume Nearly Tripled with Fuel (FAA) at 1:500
Julius B. Sugue, Konkuk University, Department of Bioresources and Food Science (Master's student; advisers Prof. Keum Young Soo and Prof. Kim Doo Hwan) · Philippines
A one-season paddy rice trial at Paju gave Fuel (FAA) at three strengths, 1:2000, 1:1000 and 1:500, on top of a full natural farming spray program, against a no-FAA control. The 1:500 plots had the most tillers, the longest roots, nearly three times the control's root volume and the most panicles per hill (23.6 vs 18.4). Filled grains per panicle and 1,000-grain weight did not differ, and no grain yield per area was reported.
What they found
Within a natural farming rice program, how does the strength of fish amino acid spray (none, 1:2000, 1:1000, 1:500) change rice growth and yield components?
Paju, Korea (Konkuk test field, about 1.5 hours from Seoul). Japonica rice, local name Chuncheong, 150-day maturity, machine-transplanted May 27, 2016 at 30 × 15 cm, about 10 seedlings per hill. Randomized complete block design, 4 replications, 5 m × 5 m plots, 400 m² total. IMO4 broadcast before transplanting; weeds controlled by water level, released snails and hand weeding; dead hills replanted; liquid IMO and a bioinsecticide also sprayed. F-test at P = 0.05 shown. Soil, grain yield per area and the bioinsecticide used are not stated.
- Control — No FAA. Received the rest of the natural farming spray program.
- T1 Fuel (FAA) 1:2000 — FAA foliar spray at 1:2000 with the Type II sprays.
- T2 FAA 1:1000 — FAA foliar spray at 1:1000 with the Type II sprays.
- T3 FAA 1:500 — FAA foliar spray at 1:500 with the Type II sprays.
- Common program, Type II (active tillering) — Medicine (OHN) 1:1000, Food (FPJ) 1:500, Cleanser (BRV) 1:500, Structure (WS calcium phosphate) 1:1000, Protectors (LAB) 1:1000, plus FAA by treatment. Five sprays; slide dates 13, 25, 38, 34 and 48 DAT (order as printed).
- Common program, transition — OHN 1:1000, FPJ 1:500, BRV 1:500, WS calcium phosphate 1:1000, Reproduction (WS calcium) 1:1000, LAB 1:1500–2000, at panicle initiation (59 DAT) and heading (80 DAT).
- Common program, Type III (flowering) — OHN 1:1000, FPJ 1:2000, BRV 1:500, WS calcium phosphate 1:1000, WS calcium 1:1000, fermented Minerals (seawater) 1:500, at 90 DAT.
- Common program, Type IV (milk stage) — OHN 1:1000, BRV 1:500, WS calcium phosphate 1:1000, at 110 DAT.
-
Root volume at flowering 180 cc with FAA 1:500 vs 65 cc in the control
Growth table: control 65.0 (c), 1:2000 105.0 (b), 1:1000 128.8 (b), 1:500 180.0 (a) cc.
▶ 13:46 From the slides
-
Most panicles per hill at 1:500: 23.6 vs 18.4 in the control
Yield table: control 18.4 (c), 1:2000 20.7 (b), 1:1000 21.1 (b), 1:500 23.6 (a); significant by F-test. The speaker called panicle number the most important yield component.
▶ 14:12 Said and shown on the slides
-
Filled grains per panicle and 1,000-grain weight did not differ
Filled grains/panicle 93.3, 93.9, 97.1, 98.5; 1,000-grain fresh weight 28.8, 29.3, 29.3, 29.5 g (control to 1:500). Both marked NS. Not mentioned in the talk.
▶ 14:12 From the slides
-
More tillers per hill with stronger FAA: 29.1 at 1:500 vs 17.0 in the control
'No. of plants/hill at tillering': control 17.0 (c), 1:2000 20.5 (bc), 1:1000 22.9 (b), 1:500 29.1 (a).
▶ 13:46 Said and shown on the slides
-
Root length 26.9 cm and leaf area index 11.7 at 1:500, vs 18.1 cm and 5.1 in the control
At flowering. Root length 18.1 (c), 23.4 (b), 23.8 (b), 26.9 (a) cm; LAI 5.1 (c), 7.2 (b), 8.9 (b), 11.7 (a).
▶ 13:46 From the slides
-
Plants taller at maturity: 97.1 cm at 1:500 vs 87.2 cm in the control
87.2 (c), 92.0 (b), 93.8 (a), 97.1 (a) cm.
▶ 13:46 From the slides
-
Natural science farming rice stood up while a nearby conventional field lodged
Photo comparison with a neighbouring conventional field, not a trial plot. No measurement.
▶ 13:17 Said and shown on the slides
- One season, one site, 4 replications of 25 m² plots.
- No grain yield per area was reported; the yield claim rests on panicles per hill, while filled grains and grain weight were not different.
- Every plot, the control included, got the full natural farming program; the trial tests FAA strength within that program, not natural farming against chemical farming.
- The lodging photo compares a neighbouring conventional field, not the control plots.
- Root photos show one hill per treatment.
- The Type II schedule on the slide lists 38 DAT before 34 DAT, so one date is probably a typo.
- The bioinsecticide used was not named.
- On paddy rice, Fuel (FAA) during active tillering was followed by more tillers, bigger roots and more panicles; the strongest rate tried, 1:500, did best in this one season.
- Spray programs can change with the crop's stage: Fuel with Type II during tillering, calcium at the transition, seawater at flowering.
- Snails and a good water level can carry much of the weed work in a paddy.
- More panicles did not bring fuller or heavier grain here; judge FAA by harvest weight before raising the rate.
Next to Master Cho's teaching
-
Agrees
FAA as the nitrogen source for vegetative growth Cho calls FAA a nitrogen input that boosts vegetative growth, sprayed or on soil, and warns against it in reproductive growth if overgrowth is a worry. The trial gave FAA only with the Type II (tillering) sprays.
Cho, Janong Natural Farming (2003), p. 128
-
Goes further
FAA at 1:500 Cho's standard is a 1,000x dilution. The trial found the stronger 1:500 rate gave more tillers, roots and panicles, but no measured yield gain.
Cho, Janong Natural Farming (2003), p. 128
-
Agrees
Making FAA: fish waste, equal brown sugar, IMO, a mosquito net, 2–6 months Cho's recipe uses blue-back fish waste with brown sugar 1:1, IMO, a mosquito net and rubber band, and says at least 6 months for well-fermented FAA. The speaker's 2 months is at the short end.
Cho, Natural Farming Agricultural Materials (Recipe), p. 50
-
Differs
About 10 seedlings per hill Cho contrasts 8–9 seeds per hill in conventional rice with 2–3 in natural farming. The trial used about 10 per hill because the machine was set that way, and the speaker noted 1–3 is usual in the Philippines.
2017/Advanced Cho/swine/IMG_1562 @ 0:15:07 (translated)
-
Agrees
Paddy animals help with weeds Cho describes shrimp, fish and small crabs in natural farming paddies eating weed seedlings; the trial released snails for the same job.
2017/Advanced Cho/advanced fruit/IMG_3213 @ 0:07:03 (translated)
“That's why we use this fish amino acid as the nitrogen source of our rice.”
▶ 4:46
“We release the snail and we allow propagation or proliferation of the snail, because somehow they can help us control the weeds.”
▶ 12:18
“Natural science on rice, we can do it!”
▶ 14:57
In this talk
- 0:00Intro
- 0:49Rice production challenges
- 2:26Natural science farming in brief
- 3:41Fish amino acid as nitrogen source
- 5:10How FAA is made
- 6:56Site, variety and design
- 7:39FAA treatments
- 8:08Type II treatment
- 9:04Transition treatment
- 10:02Type III treatment
- 10:38Type IV treatment
- 10:52IMO4 and transplanting
- 12:10Weeds, snails and other work
- 12:42Growth and root profile
- 13:14Lodging
- 13:40Growth results
- 14:12Yield components
- 14:34Summary
Transcript
Transcribed and checked by hand against the recording. Click any time to play from there.
0:00 Hi, my name is ... from the Philippines. I'm pursuing my Master's degree right now at Konkuk University. I'm happy to share with you today the secret of our activity, how we produce rice without using or with zero... without using commercial fertilizer or synthetic pesticides. So this undertaking is under the guidance of my advisors, Professor Kim Doo Hwan and Professor Keum Young Soo.
0:49 So yesterday we are lucky, we witnessed the global trend of crop production, the challenges threatening our crops right now. So yesterday Professor Jung has presented these challenges. Similar challenges falls through in our rice production. The big challenge is food security. We can ask ourselves, can we cope with the increasing demand because right now the population worldwide is still growing, so most of the developing countries are rising their staple food. So can we cope with the demand and supply gap? Then another problem is the
1:41 the pollution or the problem created by the intensified farming technologies because most of the government intensified the production of rice so that they can meet the increasing demand of their population. But what is happening now? The problem was created by the technology. The modern technology created another problem, particularly in the environment. Right now we are experiencing the undeniable threat of global warming or the climate change, which is rice is the most threatened crop. Something we should do, something should be done to address these challenges and to reverse
2:40 the current trend leading to sustainable rice production. This can be achieved by environmentally friendly crop production system. It is high time to get back to the fundamentals of agriculture, which is called the sustainable agriculture the key is to build a sound and scientific principle that will increase again or restore the fertility of the soil, that will lead to a more robust or more resistant to pests, a rice that is resistant to pests, and most of all a good or quality produce. So we simply define, or we simply describe
3:24 natural farming, natural science farming, as the farming that respect nature, because it is environmentally friendly it is sustainable without using any synthetic or any inputs that will degrade the environment. So fish amino acid is the new trend used in the technology of natural science farming. This experiment is on board in totality about... we will prove if natural farming really can produce, can we use the technology for producing
4:12 rice, rice grain. So we chose fish amino acid because amino acid contains protein nitrogen we all know that nitrogen is the most important nutrient element needed by crops, needed by rice to produce more tillers during vegetative stage and to produce more grains during the panicle, panicle initiation... during the panicle initiation stage. That's why we use this fish amino acid as the nitrogen source of our rice. So it is also interesting to know that it can promote fruiting, it can promote microbe action in the soil, and it can promote nutrient uptake
5:03 and chlorophyll production. If they work together, it will become beneficial to our rice. So how can we make fish amino acid? I know that we have all the experts here in natural science farming, so I think there are a lot of... we have common standards, but there are some some differences because we need to consider some climatic conditions we have different climatic conditions in different countries so anyway the fermentation might be the different fermentation process or the duration of fermentation but the most I want to emphasize here the common
5:47 ingredients, which is very basic, which is very readily available in our household. We just need the fish, I mean fish by-product, brown sugar, IMO3, porous paper or mosquito net, rubber band, and clay or glass jar, or the container. Then the process of making fish amino acid is very simple. Just chop, just chop into pieces, small pieces, the fish by-product, and mix with equal amount of sugar mix well put into the container then seal it with sugar again then cover with porous paper and put in a well-ventilated, dark, cool place, so that we will wait for the
6:35 for the mixture to ferment. It will take around two to six months, so that we can produce a good concoction, and it can be used by foliar or by soil drenching. We can water it, directly applied into the soil, or through mist spray in the foliage of our crops. So the experiment was conducted in Paju, one and a half hours from Seoul by car, and we conducted transplanting last May 27, 2016, and the rice we used is Japonica type rice. It is common in Korea. The local term for this rice is Chuncheong rice, and it has a 150 days maturity.
7:27 We employ the randomized complete block design with four replications. Each plot measures five by five, or the total experimental plot is 400 square meters. And the fish amino acid treatment: for our control, we did not use any fish amino acid. For treatment one we use the 2,000 dilution, for treatment two we use 1,000 dilution, and for treatment three we use 500 dilution. These are the nutrients. We follow the standard, or the book, or the references we have gathered from our experts. So Type 2 treatment was
8:16 applied during the active tillering stage. Anyway, the component of type 2 nutrients are these. OHN or oriental herbal nutrient, FPJ or fermented plant juice, BRV or brown rice vinegar, and lactic acid bacteria and also the FAA depending on our treatment on the dilution of the experiment. So we applied all the nutrients during the 13 days after transplanting and until the 48 days after transplanting. This period are the vegetative stage of the rice crop. We applied five times this nutrient.
9:04 Then for the next treatment, we use the transition treatment, two times, during the panicle initiation stage. Panicle initiation stage can be determined when you get a stem of the rice, you can see 2 millimeter white particle in the stem or inside the vascular membrane or the culm. So you can see a 2 millimeter protruding white, small piece of white membrane. So we determined that, when we see that, after 59 days after
9:49 transplanting, so we spray immediately with this transition treatment. Then we repeated the application during the heading stage, 80 days after transplanting. The components are these. then for the next treatment we use the type 3 treatment during the flowering stage. So it is visible when you see the rice panicle already appearing after the heading stage. You can see the spikelets are now producing white pollen, so we can already spray with this treatment, containing all the OHN... almost similar components, but they differ only on the dilution rate or the concentration.
10:38 And lastly, the last treatment we applied in the rice crop is Type 4 treatment, during the milking or soft dough stage. Then these are the activities we have done before producing a good grain. So before transplanting, we scattered or we broadcast IMO4 in the soil. Then we use mechanical transplanter because you know in Korea they are already fully mechanized manual labor is not common in Korea but in the Philippines we are still using
11:23 manual transplanting but here we use this machine so the planting distance is 30 by 15 it is already predetermined or the setting of the machine is already this way. But if you will use manual transplanting, you can manipulate the distance in the Philippines we use 20 by 20 or 20 by 15 but here in Korea they are using 30 by 15. And the average seedling per hill, the number of seedlings here, they crowd, it's quite many. Usually in the Philippines we use one or two to three. But here because the machine is already
12:10 Then weed control: we do manual weeding, we release the snail, and we allow propagation or proliferation of the snail, because somehow they can help us control the weeds and we keep good water level to suppress the weeds. And we do replanting when we observe that there are dead hills. Then we spray all the nutrients. We apply the nutrients through foliar spraying. We use also liquid IMO and bioinsecticide, and we observe that there are less pestilence. Then these are the transition, or growth transition, of the plants. You can see from
12:49 seedling to this very robust and productive rice plant. And you can see the root profile. This is the control and this is the treatment. You can see the profuseness and the sturdiness of the roots and the thickness of the roots when they are applied with fish amino acid. And you can see, I just... we just took this picture just to compare the resistance to lodging, or the resistance to strong winds. Natural grown crop is more stronger than the conventional. This field is around our field, so you can see they are already lodging. And these are the results. You
13:42 can see there is a significant improvement in the growth parameters of rice, particularly on tillering, on root length, plant height, number of plants per hill, root length, root volume, leaf area index, and plant height. So you can see control has the least figure, and treatment three exhibited the highest performance compared to all other treatments. Then in this table, I want to emphasize here that number of panicles is the most important component to determine rice yield. So you can see there is a significant contribution of fish amino acid on the number of panicles
14:33 per hill. Then to summarize my report, I can say that FAA significantly improved rice growth. Use of FAA with 500 dilution holds potentiality to boost growth and productivity of rice. So right now, natural science farming will produce high output with natural inputs. So I want to end my report by simply shouting: natural science on rice, we can do it! Thank you.